If there’s anything that’s holding back the San Joaquin County region – and keeping it from being all it can be – it’s our continued tolerance for mediocre leadership and substandard elected officials.

Think about it:  How many politicians that you voted for – even if they were borderline decent in office – have left public life under an ethical cloud?  Or even after getting into trouble with the law?

 This is why it’s time to really start asking some tough questions about Jim DeMartini while also taking the time to connect the dots and figure out what he may be up to.  Can you say “abuse of office”?

As we take a deeper look at this issue, let’s look to Patterson, the small city with a big-time develop battle going on.

The November 2nd edition of the Modesto Bee carried a fascinating story that may be the single most embarrassing conduct by a SJ politician in some time.  Here’s what went down:

The citizens advisory committee to the Stanislaus County Council of Governments policy board voted 7-0 to support state funding for a short-haul rail link between the Port of Oakland and a proposed business park near Crows Landing.

The vote Wednesday night came despite an attack on the project by county Supervisor Jim DeMartini, and a comment by advisory committee member Doug Sweetland that DeMartini's actions were "inappropriate" and "an abuse of (DeMartini's) position."

Hey now!  That’s one way to put it.

I’ve read a lot of troubling news stories in my time, but this is at the top.  How can anyone read this and not conclude that DeMartini is an embarrassment?

Just like it is with some of the SJV’s more colorful (read: “not entirely honest”) politicians, DeMartini is giving us every reason to take a closer look at what he’s up to.  We can’t just chalk it up to eccentricity.  We can’t just say that DeMartini is a contrarian.  He’s not.  He’s not a leader, he’s a follower.  So what’s he up to?

Some will no doubt eventually conclude that DeMartini is under the control of one Ross Perot, Jr. the son of the ex-Presidential candidate of the same name.  Or perhaps he is allowing locals to speculate to that effect while doing the bidding of all the other local developers who stand to lose their monopoly on Patterson development. 

Perhaps we’ll never know the real story … or perhaps we’re just waiting for some enterprising journalist to ask some real questions and get the real story.

Of course, they haven’t outlawed all of the region’s competitive elections, and now DeMartini has drawn a number of challengers in his uphill race for re-election.

And just when you thought it was safe for you to let your kids read the Bee again …

The truly bizarre story of DeMartini and a 22-year-old woman got the short shrift in the latest Modesto Bee article about this incident.

The Bee piece described all the fraud charges filed against this woman, but truly missing from a fairly detailed article was this – oh, I don’t know – important fact:  DeMartini said he co-signed a car loan and gave a woman decades younger than him a down payment when she wrecked her car.

Come on, now:  Haven’t we all given thousands of dollars to much younger people to whom we are not married?

But, an interesting tidbit emerged from the continuation of the young lady’s trial and a claim from her lawyer, celebrity attorney Mark Geragos:

Then there was a challenge by Geragos, who said local prosecutors should turn the case over to the state attorney general's office, because DeMartini is one of five county supervisors who control the budget of the district attorney's office. That, he said, amounts to a conflict of interest.

“He controls the purse strings,” Geragos said.

 What an embarrassment.